Sunday 4 November 2012

Chinese Atheist Jihad Hits Michigan



This week saw a typical example of official accounts of “terrorism” in Xinjiang and the importance of power in the reproduction of “knowledge”: un-named Chinese officials from un-named departments spoke anonymously and without any evidence to claim that Uyghur “terrorists” are training and operating in Syria. Just to illustrate the point, we would like to announce that we have discovered that Han Chinese terrorists are training with the Michigan militias under the command of the HAM (Han Atheist Movement). How do we know this? Well we can’t tell you but we can assure you that this is a grave threat to the unity of the nation and social stability. Now these shocking revelations are unlikely to be picked up by news agencies and instead will be taken as the random, baseless, and concocted nonsense that they are. Of course, if you are a Chinese official then you have the power to randomly disseminate your ‘truth’ but if you are a blogger, you are actually burdened by the need to have evidence! One of the groups allegedly responsible for this international terrorist threat, the East Turkestan Education and Solidarity Association (ETESA), responded by saying that these claims are only designed to marginalise Uyghurs in the international community because they are not a terrorist organisation and have been legally established in Turkey. The East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) has yet to respond because even they don’t know who they are! Thankfully these stories didn’t make too much impact on the international news but they do indicate that the party-state’s strategy in speaking to the world about Uyghurs centres on imagining a transnational terrorist threat.

Stability Overcomes Everything?



The People’s Daily has disturbingly reported that officials will be dismissed on the spot if their areas of responsibility became unstable. This creates a system whereby the livelihood of officials and their families depend on their readiness to respond to any public dissent with violence or to engage in covering it all up. As if this wasn’t potentially destabilising enough, announcements were also made that the Bingtuan Armed Police has been elevated to a status equal to the Xinjiang Armed Police! The Bingtuan armed police will now report directly to the Central Military Commission in Beijing and is consolidating its status as a state within a state. This means that in instances of unrest, Xinjiang will have two armed paramilitary organisations which are not accountable to one another and could potentially find themselves in competition over state resources and areas of responsibility. Given that this was coupled with announcements that officials will be fired on the spot in any instances of “instability”, this could lead to rather unstable and unpredictable consequences. Furthermore, officials will have personal vested interests in ensuring that no one ever finds about such problems. So we can expect more secrecy, more rumours, and more instability in a region where the party tells us that “stability overcomes everything”!